04-12-2008

Dergi Hakkında
Yayın Kurulu
Danışma Kurulu
Yazım Kuralları
Yayın Hakları Devir Formu
Online Makale İşlemleri
İletişim
Oftalmoloji Dergisi
ISSN: 1300-0365
Dil: Türkçe

 

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES


A Comparison Of Latanoprost, Travoprost, And Bimatoprost ın The Treatment Of Patients With Primary Open - Angle Glaucoma

Dr. Emine MALKOÇ ŞEN,a Dr. Tülay TUNA,a Dr. Ferhan URAL,a Dr. Gültekin KÖKLÜ,a Dr. Esin FIRATa
a1. Göz Kliniği, SB. Ankara Ulucanlar Göz Hastanesi, ANKARA



Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost as monoterapy in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
Material and Methods: Between April 2004 and April 2005, 174 eyes of 90 patients who were newly diagnosed as POAG were enrolled in the study, at Glaucoma Department in our clinic. Patients were randomized to take latanoprost 0.005% (1st group), travoprost 0.004% (2nd group), and bimatoprost 0.03% (3rd group) and they were called back on the 1. week, 2. weeks, the 1. month, 3. month, 6. month, 9. months for control. All the patients were scored by means of hyperemia with one physician and questioned for pain, ocular pruritis and burning, hyperemia, foreign body sensation, blurred vision. For statistical analysis oneway ANOVA, 2, paired t test, wilcoxon test and Mann-Withney U test were used. For primary effect, intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 8:00 AM and the difference between the beginning and the end of the treatment were taken. p< 0.05 was accepted as stastically significant.
Results: Of all patients, 84 (93.3%) had POAG and 6 (6.6%) had pseudoexfoliation, and they were randomized in three groups. Mean follow up in 1. group was 17.1 ± 2.49 weeks (4-36), in 2. group was 14.1 ± 3.42 (4-32) weeks, and in 3. group13.3 ± 3.12 (4-30) weeks. Pretreatment IOPs in first, 2., and 3. groups were 23.80 ± 4.89, 24.23 ± 5.78, and 24.05 ± 3.86 respectively. Posttreatment results were 16.32 ± 2.49, 16.00 ± 3.42, and 15.75 ± 3.12. The primary side effect of all groups was hyperemia, which was seen 15.5% in first group, 42.1% in 2. group and %50 in 3. group.
Conclusions: Pretreatment IOPs at 08.00 AM were similar in all groups. Posttreatment IOPs were decreased significantly (p< 0.005). Adverse effects were mostly seen in 3. group, where they were least in 1. group.


Keywords: Primary open-angle glaucoma, latanoprost, travoprost, bimatoprost, efficacy, adverse effects

Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol 2006, 15:12-17

E-mail To Friend This Page Printer Friendly Page
 
 
 ARAMA
  
 Ayrıntılı Arama
 GİRİŞ
 Kullanıcı Adı :
 
 Şifre  
   Beni Hatırla
 Şifremi Unuttum
 Kayıt Ol
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Yasal uyarı: Bu sitede yayınlanan resim, yazı ve diğer uygulamaların her hakkı Ortadoğu Reklam Ve Yayıncılık A.Ş. 'ye aittir. Kaynak gösterilmeden kullanılamaz. Bu site hekimleri sağlık alanında bilgilendirmeye yönelik hazırlanmıştır. Sitede yer alan bilgiler tanı ve tedavi amaçlı kullanıldığında sorumluluk tamamen kullanıcıya aittir. Siteye girmekle bu şartları okumuş, anlamış ve kabul etmiş sayılırsınız.