12-10-2008

Dergi Hakkında
Yayın Kurulu
Danışma Kurulu
Yazım Kuralları
Yayın Hakları Devir Formu
Online Makale İşlemleri
İletişim
Oftalmoloji Dergisi
ISSN: 1300-0365
Dil: Türkçe

 

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES


Thinoptx Vs. Acrysof: Comparison Of Visual And Refractive Results, Changes In Contrast Sensitivity And Incidence Of Posterior Capsule Opacification

Dr. Vedat KAYA,a Dr. Zeynep K. ÖZTÜRKER, a Dr. Can ÖZTÜRKER, a Dr. Özgür YAŞAR, aDr. Hakan SİVRİKAYA, a Dr. Alper AĞCA, a Dr. Ömer Faruk YILMAZa
aGöz Kliniği, Beyoğlu Göz Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, İSTANBUL



Objective: To evaluate the visual and refractive results, the changes in contrast sensitivity and the incidence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after implantation of UltraChoice 1.0 ThinOptX (ThinOptX Inc.) IOL and conventional acrylic foldable IOL (AcrySof MA30AC) in fellow eyes.
Material and Methods: Fifty eyes of 25 patients were randomized into two groups prospectively: In Group 1 microincisional phacoemulsification and ThinOptX IOL implantation were applied in one eye and in Group 2 conventional phacoemulsification and AcrySof IOL implantation were applied in the fellow eye. Uncorrected (UCVA) and best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BCVA), surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), contrast sensitivity and the incidence of PCO were observed in the two groups and compared between of them.
Results: Mean follow-up period was 12.8 ± 1.5 months (range 11 to 14 months). In the last follow up examination UCVA and BCVA were significantly lower (p< 0.05) and PCO scores were significantly higher in Group 1 (p< 0.001). Although SIA was lower in Group 1, the difference was not statistically significant. Contrast sensitivity in higher spatial frequencies were significantly lower in Group 1 in the 6th month and 12th month visits (p< 0.05). Capsular contraction was seen in 3 eyes (12%) in Group 1 whereas there was no capsular contraction or phimosis in Group 2.
Conclusions: Long term evaluation of ThinOptX IOL concludes with an increased rate of PCO and diminished resistance to capsular contraction than AcrySof IOL and is associated with a decrease in visual performance. The poor after cataract performance of these rollable lenses shows that micro-phacoemulsification and ThinOptX IOL implantation is not as effective as conventional phacoemulsification and AcrySof IOL implantation in the long term.


Keywords: Cataract extraction; contrast sensitivity

Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol 2007, 16:20-27

E-mail To Friend This Page Printer Friendly Page
 
 
 ARAMA
  
 Ayrıntılı Arama
 GİRİŞ
 Kullanıcı Adı :
 
 Şifre  
   Beni Hatırla
 Şifremi Unuttum
 Kayıt Ol
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Yasal uyarı: Bu sitede yayınlanan resim, yazı ve diğer uygulamaların her hakkı Ortadoğu Reklam Ve Yayıncılık A.Ş. 'ye aittir. Kaynak gösterilmeden kullanılamaz. Bu site hekimleri sağlık alanında bilgilendirmeye yönelik hazırlanmıştır. Sitede yer alan bilgiler tanı ve tedavi amaçlı kullanıldığında sorumluluk tamamen kullanıcıya aittir. Siteye girmekle bu şartları okumuş, anlamış ve kabul etmiş sayılırsınız.